Vass Bednar: Meta’s latest audacious move shows why Canadians must keep pushing back against Big Tech

Skip to Content News Archives Economy Defence Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Defence Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Defence Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.HomeInnovationThis section is This section was produced by the editorial department. The client was not given the opportunity to put restrictions on the content or review it prior to publication. by BDCVass Bednar: Meta's latest audacious move shows why Canadians must keep pushing back against Big TechProposed change to business terms of service would have potentially given tech giant right to scrape data to train AIThe Meta Platforms Inc. office building in the 'Silicon Docks' area of central Dublin, Ireland. Photo by BLOOMBERG FILESA couple of months ago, when speaking at the European Parliament amid talk of partnership and shared prosperity, Prime Minister Mark Carney delivered a warning about big tech.THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLYSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESSubscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLESCreate an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an Account“Technology platforms increasingly seek to act as sovereign powers,” Carney said. “They want to dictate the rules of regulation — and even circumvent them. They want to control our data, spread misinformation and steal our children’s childhoods.”This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.As if it was trying to prove his point, earlier this month, Meta Platforms Inc. informed business customers that it was updating its commercial terms of service with language that many believed gave Meta clearance to crawl their websites and use the content to train its AI products.Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againAfter a swift backlash, particularly from publishers in the U.S., Meta removed the word “train” from the new terms within a day, claiming that the crawling applied only to its ad and business products.But the backlash hasn’t fully died down. Some experts say the updated terms of service — which allow Meta to “develop” and “improve” its business products using crawled data — could still give it unfettered access to publishers’ content for AI training.Meta has now delayed the implementation of the new terms until Nov. 20, which the company has said will give it more time to explain how it uses web crawlers and delineate “what’s changing and what’s not.”It’s fitting to think that this episode is happening as Aaron Sorkin’s The Social Reckoning plays to disinterested theatre-goers. The film dramatizes the 2021 Facebook Files, a series of articles published in the Wall Street Journal based on leaks from Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, which galvanized readers as it was revealed that the company knew its products caused harm. On screen and off, the pattern appears to be continuing: Meta moves first and fast, and then “asks” permission when they are caught.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.Meta’s crawlers already roam the open web gathering training data.The company also trains on public posts, photos and comments on platforms it owns, Facebook, Instagram and Threads (going back to 2007). Privacy laws force a formal opt-out option in the EU and the U.K., but elsewhere, the main defence for individuals is making your posts private.Under the original wording of its new terms of service, critics feared that any business using Meta’s ad or business tools would have agreed, by contract, to allow Meta to use all of their content to train its various products, and that the new terms could override or circumvent previous objections.There is a certain audacity to flipping every one of your existing advertising relationships into a free license to feed your AI, and in treating anyone who shares anything on your services as a source of free training material.Canadian news publishers are already familiar with Meta’s strongarm tactics, as the company has blocked news for the past three years, rather than pay publishers for sharing their content on its platforms.This advertisement has not loaded yet.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.When it comes to AI, Meta is in the same frantic race as other frontier developers. The firm expects to spend $135 billion to $145 billion on AI infrastructure this year, and that’s just for data centres. If Meta had to pay for training data, the economics of the technology might never work.In May, federal and provincial privacy commissioners found that OpenAI violated Canadian privacy law, partly by scraping public websites and social media without valid consent. That finding should raise questions about Meta’s own crawling.Perhaps a deeper issue is why we continue to use Meta’s platforms — voluntarily creating content for the machine to ingest and monetize. We continue to create the raw material that informs algorithmic models for a company that refuses to pay for the journalism it takes, or even show it to us.The federal government spent $1,409,238 on Facebook and Instagram ads in fiscal 2024-25. Though well below historic highs, that’s nearly triple the $476,271 spent in 2023-24. The platform blocks traditional news media, and yet we’re still providing it with tax dollars.This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.One can expect Meta to continue to creatively rewrite its terms as it attempts to secure reliable profitability. Why do we keep agreeing? Governments and courts are working to set terms of their own, and Meta’s latest walk back is a reminder that pushback works. But this fight is far from over.Muse, Meta’s surveillant Tamagotchi-like AI agent demands deep trust. But you don’t give your car over to a valet that you just caught rifling through the glove box. The latest episode is a reminder that we can say ‘No’ to Meta. We should keep saying it.Vass Bednar is managing director of the Canadian Shield InstituteThis advertisement has not loaded yet.Notice for the Postmedia NetworkThis website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.