Lindsay Clancy returns to court for retrial hearing as lawyer says she's still suicidal: Live updates

Updated: 09:34 EDT, 2 November 2026 Lindsay Clancy is due back in a Massachusetts courtroom on Monday, where a judge could set a date for her second murder trial in the killings of her three children.Prosecutors have still not confirmed whether they will try the 36-year-old again after her first trial ended in a hung jury, split 11 to 1 to acquit, in September.Clancy was charged with triple first-degree murder for the January 2023 killings of her children, five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson and eight-month-old Callan.She admitted to strangling the kids, but pleaded not guilty to murder by reason of insanity, saying she was suffering severe postpartum psychosis and was overmedicated by doctors.On Monday, the prosecution, the defense and Judge William Sullivan are set to discuss scheduling Clancy's retrial, as well as several other motions.Follow the Daily Mail for more updates... Judge says: 'Didn't I do a voir dire?' Judge William Sullivan interrupted Weinberg as he spoke about issues with the jury.'We contend that those two notes cried out for a probing voir dire that would attempt to establish whether or not the 12th juror was honoring his oath,' Weinberg said.Sullivan interrupted: 'Didn't I do a voir dire?'Defense claims mistrial was declared 'in the heat of the moment'Clancy's attorney, Martin Weinberg, who previously represented Karen Read, is arguing the motion to dismiss.He claimed the court's decision to declare a mistrial was made 'in the heat of the moment.'Weinberg argued that Clancy has a right to an impartial jury.'We contend, based on these jury notes, that not all 12 jurors were following your instructions,' Weinberg said.Hearing is underwayJudge William Sullivan welcomed the parties back into court for Lindsay Clancy's hearing.'It’s a beautiful day to continue the journey,' defense attorney Kevin Reddington told reporters as he walked in.Sullivan said they will discuss the motion to dismiss first, then hear other motions. Clancy is sitting at the defense table, wearing a green blouse.Kevin Reddington arrives at courtDefense attorney Kevin Reddington was pictured arriving at the courthouse for Lindsay Clancy's hearing.Tensions erupt between Lindsay Clancy and ex-husband PatrickDefense attorney Kevin Reddington pushed back on Wednesday against claims made by Patrick’s lawyer, Howard Cooper, who said he expected Lindsay to take the stand in Patrick’s wrongful death lawsuit against her former doctors.'It has come to my attention that counsel for Patrick Clancy represented to the court in his civil case that my client, Lindsay Clancy, will testify about statements she made to her healthcare providers,' defense lawyer Kevin Reddington told CBS Boston.'Lindsay Clancy never told any of her healthcare providers that she harbored homicidal ideation toward her children,' he added.'She never indicated that she intended to testify in Mr Clancy's lawsuit, and no one acting for her ever represented that she would. Mr Clancy's counsel does not speak for Lindsay Clancy.' Reddington’s comments came hours after Patrick’s legal team appeared in Norfolk County Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts, on Wednesday for the first hearing in his civil lawsuit. Patrick and Lindsay each filed lawsuits against her former mental health doctors earlier this year, accusing them of ignoring her cries for help in the months before the triple murders. District Attorney insists Clancy's murder charges should not be dismissedLast week, the Plymouth County District Attorney's Office made a filing urging the judge to reject Lindsay Clancy's attempt to dismiss her murder charges even as they refuse to commit to a second trial. The killer mom, 36, previously filed a motion to throw out the charges as her attorneys claimed a second trial would violate 'double jeopardy' rules, which prevent authorities from prosecuting a person twice for the same crime. Prosecutors argued that Clancy's case does not meet the criteria because it only prevents a person from being punished twice after an acquittal or a conviction. In the two months since the mistrial, prosecutors have not indicated if they intend to move forward with a second murder trial, or if they plan to offer Clancy a plea deal.What is double jeopardy?Defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed a motion to throw out the charges, as her attorneys claimed a second trial would violate 'double jeopardy' rules, which prevent authorities from prosecuting a person twice for the same crime.Prosecutors argued that Clancy's case does not meet the criteria because double jeopardy prevents a person from being punished twice only after an acquittal or a conviction.The Fifth Amendment gives citizens the right against double jeopardy, which protects them from being punished twice for the same crime.The Constitution of the United States prevents the government from trying a person again for the same crime after they have already been found innocent or guilty. Clancy's attorneys say she is suicidal and has 'horrible dreams'Clancy's civil attorneys are claiming they believe if given the opportunity, she would commit suicide.'She doesn't want to be here. She wants to be with her children, and if given the opportunity, I have no doubt in my mind at all that she would take her own life,' attorney Rosemary Scapicchio told CBS News.Scapicchio said all Clancy thinks about 'is that her kids are no longer here,' and that she has 'horrible dreams.''She walks around all day with that right here in her face, every single solitary day, and then she sleeps and has horrible dreams about this,' she said.If you or someone you know needs help, please call or text the confidential 24/7 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline in the US on 988. There is also an online chat available at 988lifeline.org.Lindsay Clancy back in court to argue that she should not face retrial Lindsay Clancy is due back in a Massachusetts courtroom on Monday, where a judge could set a date for her second murder trial in the killings of her three children.The prosecution, the defense and Judge William Sullivan are set to discuss scheduling Clancy's retrial, as well as several other motions.Defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed a motion to throw out the charges as her attorneys claimed a second trial would violate 'double jeopardy' rules, which prevent authorities from prosecuting a person twice for the same crime.Prosecutors argued that Clancy's case does not meet the criteria because double jeopardy prevents a person from being punished twice only after an acquittal or a conviction.Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz has not indicated whether they intend to move forward with a second murder trial or if they plan to offer Clancy a plea deal.Clancy's trial was upended by a lone holdout juror who refused to change his vote, leading Clancy's attorneys to try to reverse the mistrial over allegations he had 'reasonable doubt.'The juror, Michael Desronvil, denied that he had reasonable doubt, and prosecutors argued in their filing this week that the Supreme Court has previously ruled against 'post-trial juror revelations about their deliberations to affect the analysis.'