Legal opinion ‘backs’ Chandrasekaran’s reappointment as Tata Sons chairman

N. Chandrasekaran. File. | Photo Credit: PTI Legal opinions obtained by Tata Sons support the validity of N. Chandrasekaran’s reappointment as chairman for a third five-year term, saying the provision in the company’s Articles of Association (AoA) that requires a Selection Committee applies to the appointment of a new chairman and not to the extension or reappointment of an incumbent.While former Supreme Court judges Justice B.N. Srikrishna and Justice Uday U. Lalit opined the casting vote exercised by the chairman of the Tata Group board was valid under the company’s AoA, the September 17 board resolution giving Mr. Chandrasekaran a third term was on the lines of a similar one that gave him a second term in 2022.Justice Srikrishna said the action was consistent with Article 121, while Justice Lalit said the equality of votes among directors appointed under Article 104B provided an occasion for the chairman to exercise a casting vote.Tata Trusts, which owns about 66% of Tata Sons, challenged the September 17 board resolution giving Mr. Chandrasekaran a third term, arguing that its AoA requires affirmative support from a majority of Trust-nominated directors and a chairman’s casting vote cannot override that requirement. Published - September 24, 2026 10:47 pm IST