A Mail Voting Fight About Nothing

A Mail Voting Fight About Nothing

Whatever the legal outcome of the postal service’s proposed role in administering elections, more secure elections won’t result. Turn any article into a podcast. Upgrade now to start listening. Members can share articles with friends & family to bypass the paywall. On Sunday, the Trump administration made its third appeal in less than six weeks to the Supreme Court, seeking to move ahead with implementing a role for the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) in overseeing mail ballots as some blue states try to block it. Setting aside the legal back-and-forth, the strange thing about the saga is that even if implemented, the USPS list-matching rule—the item at dispute in the litigation—would do nothing for election integrity. Stephen Richer is the CEO of Republic Affairs, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, and a senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School. He is the former recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona. More We Think You’d Like

Original Source

Read the full article at Thedispatch →

KhanList aggregates and links to publicly available news content. We do not host full articles from third-party sources. Always verify important information with original sources.